Blue4blue Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
920371799
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Miami, FL, USA
Phone
7862997542
Rating
91
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Counseling, Support Groups

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$127,132
Expenses
$110,189
Assets
$17,243
Liabilities
$300

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ALEJANDRO PALACIO (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ALEJANDRO PALACIO (PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN LEVY (CFO)
  • DELIO JIMENEZ (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Support law enforcement officers in the state of Florida who are experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder (ptsd) or other mental health challenges.

What it reported doing in 2025

The organization operates a wellness support trailer located at 3300 nw 27 ave to provide mental health support to current and retired law enforcement officers. Blue4blue also has a toll-free hotline for Florida officers to call for support.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 89
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 84.3%; rating input score 84
  • Program expense ratio: 97.2%; rating input score 97

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 13.3%; rating input score 61; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 26.8%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 87.4% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 100.7% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 197.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 84.3% of revenue deployed · 97.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $107K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 16/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 33/100.