Blue Ridge Youth Hockey Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

5 people listed

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Promote youth hockey

Donations

Revenue model: Earned-program. 63% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model: Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Mission deployment rate: Limited
Program expense ratio: Limited
Fundraising efficiency: $2.13 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Consistency checks: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Pay-setting controls: Limited
Foreign activity oversight: Limited
Grant itemization coverage: Limited
Major donor itemization: Limited
Related-party transparency: Limited

Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Operating margin: 23.1%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.32; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Program expense growth: Limited
Revenue growth: 190.7% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Asset growth: 164.9% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
Governance: 5 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
Schedules: 1 filed schedules
Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
Contacts: How to reach this organization
Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 23/100.
High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.