Blue Ridge Care

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
541126227
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Winchester, VA, US
Phone
(540) 313-9200
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Hospices

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,951,882
Expenses
$37,086,098
Assets
$25,739,731
Liabilities
$10,920,622

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

25 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JASON PARSONS (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • ANTHONY CROSEN (VICE PRESIDENT THRIFT OPERATIONS & FACILITIES)
  • JARED LANZA (VICE PRESIDENT FP&A)
  • ANGEL DEHAVEN (VICE PRESIDENT COMPLIANCE, QUALITY, & EDUCATION)

Highest reported compensation

  • BRENDAN FLYNN (CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $417,990 total reported compensation
  • JASON PARSONS (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $347,859 total reported compensation
  • JULIE LANDRIO (MEDICAL DIRECTOR): $319,559 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Blue Ridge Care delivers extraordinary care to improve life’s journey.

What it reported doing in 2024

Blue ridge hospice, inc. Began operations in november 1979, through the vision and determination of two individuals. Blue ridge hospice is a medicare and medicaid-certified hospice not-for-profit 501(c )(3) organization providing physical, emotional, social, and spiritual care for the terminally ill and their families. Blue ridge hospice has also earned the joint commission's gold seal of approval. At its inception, blue ridge hospice served only a few patients each day in the winchester area. Now they serve approximately 2,100 patients a year and are regarded as an integral part of the health services system in the northern shenandoah valley and surrounding area including the city of winchester and surrounding counties (frederick, clarke, warren, shenandoah, page, fauquier, and loudoun) offering a variety of care programs, including but not limited to, music therapy, bereavement, and chaplain services. Throughout the years and its growth, blue ridge hospice's has remained constant. The hospice strives to make quality end-of-life care available to individuals and families facing serious illness and to support anyone in our community affected by death, dying, and loss. Services provided by the hospice are under professional medical supervision and provided to allow the dying person to live as pain-free and comfortable as possible. These services include physician care, nursing care, social work, certified nursing assistants, spiritual support, bereavement counseling, music therapy, and volunteer assistance. Nearly 180 volunteers offer generous contributions of time, talent, and compassion to the patients and their families. Patients are served regardless of their ability to pay for the hospice services and provided approximately $104,000 in charity care during 2024. The costs of this care, as well as the cost of providing unreimbursed services, is supplemented by the operation of blue ridge hospice's various thrift shops. These thrift shops promote the hospice mission and awareness as well as support the services provided to patients and families that are well beyond medicare and other insurance reimbursement. The expenses associated with the operation of the thrift shops are included in fundraising expenses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 72% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 53
  • Transparency & Controls: 84
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.3%; rating input score 59
  • Program expense ratio: 59.7%; rating input score 60
  • Fundraising efficiency: $1.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Pass
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.4%; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.69; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 7.4%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 7.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 59.3% of revenue deployed · 59.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $418K · 25 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $4.6M reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 11 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 59/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 29/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 24/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 33/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.