Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 382338506
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
- Location
- Detroit, MI, USA
- Phone
- 3132256688
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fund Raising and/or Fund Distribution
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,537,888
- Expenses
- $2,997,758
- Assets
- $63,752,090
- Liabilities
- $1,810,959
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- TIFFANY ALBERT (PRESIDENT & SVP)
- AUDREY J HARVEY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- LYNDA ROSSI (FORMER OFFICER/DIRECTOR): $7,891,259 total reported compensation
- JAMES GRANT MD (EVP AND CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER): $2,679,274 total reported compensation
- TIFFANY ALBERT (PRESIDENT & SVP): $2,299,972 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The bcbsm foundation's mission is to support healthcare research and innovative programs designed to improve the health of Michigan residents. Our vision is that Michigan's population will enjoy improved health and access to quality high-value care. The foundation will be a leader in fostering the development of socially responsible and innovative solutions to critical issues that affect the health of Michigan residents. We accomplish our work by valuing: commitment to quality performance; honesty, integrity, collaboration, and teamwork; effective and efficient use of resources; excellence in programs, grants, and communications; at the blue cross blue shield of Michigan foundation, our team is always looking for new ways to support community innovation that will ensure michiganders can enjoy both advancing balanced health care treatment with uniformity in healthy outcomes; increasing access to health care, improving the quality of health care and increasing the value of health care.
What it reported doing in 2025
Research grant awards are made to address the cost and quality of health care. These awards are made to Michigan researchers, physicians and students at universities, and hospitals. Before an innovative idea can be implemented, it must first be tested. The investigator-initiated research program is designed for Michigan researchers, enabling them to turn theory into data and data into knowledge. These grant partners often increase their influence in academic circles and community platforms to inform and shape future thought and improvement. The bcbsm foundation's investigator initiated research award program empowers scholars to fill critical gaps in Michigan's health care knowledge. By funding rigorous pilots, secondary data analyses and feasibility studies to test the implementation of innovative interventions to improve health outcomes, this research program accelerates evidence-based solutions that can be scaled across the state's many unique communities. In 2025, nine researchers received funding to explore everything from early life behavioral health and improving early detection of exposure to polyfluoroalkyl substances, to measuring maternal well-being and how geography and program timing shape outcomes for the rx kids program expansion in the eastern upper peninsula. These innovative studies can generate actionable data that health systems, policymakers and providers can adopt quickly, while supporting a robust, statewide research ecosystem. The physician investigator research award program empowers Michigan physicians to translate the insights they gather in daily practice into rigorous research that advances health care access, value and quality. By providing dedicated funding for physician-led investigations, the program bridges the gap between frontline observations and evidence-based solutions, enabling clinicians to address systemic barriers, improve patient outcomes, and inform policy and practice improvements. In 2025, two physicians were awarded funding to support projects that directly responded to the pressing needs of their patient populations and set the stage for broader impact across the state's health system. The student award program fuels the next generation of Michigan health care research by providing awards for student research projects that tackle health-related challenges. In 2025, the program made awards to 23 medical, pharmacy, nursing, psychology and public health doctoral students from seven universities across the state. Grants enable scholars to generate data, tools and publishable results that can deliver early evidence to inform practice and policy the impact is twofold. First, students gain research experience that distinguishes them in a competitive job market, positioning them as future leaders in clinical practice, policy and technology. Second, the research proposals address pressing gaps in health care understanding and outcomes. Research projects supported in 2025 include an interdisciplinary investigation of how micro and nano plastics pervasive in the great lakes affect the human gut microbiome, the exploration of cancer medication self management, telehealth-delivered therapy for psychogenic seizures and contributing factors for cognitive change during perimenopause. By turning innovative ideas and health-related questions into actionable research, the student award program builds a pipeline of skilled, community-focused health professionals ready to improve outcomes for all michiganians.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 63% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 72
- Accountability: 72
- Sustainability: 39
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 77.7%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -18.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 21.27; rating input score 95; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 46.3%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.4% per year; rating input score 100; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 27.6% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 0.6% per year; rating input score 100; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 77.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 6 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $2.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $7.9M · 9 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes grants and executive pay
- Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.