Bloom-vernon Elementary Pto
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 461726105
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- South Webster, OH, USA
- Phone
- 7403579228
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Parent/Teacher Group
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $36,318
- Expenses
- $38,371
- Assets
- $88,434
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Rebecca Mantle (President)
People named in this filing
- Rebecca Mantle (President)
- Katie Allard (Secretary/Reptr)
- Mary Evans (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the Bloom-Vernon Elementary School PTO shall be to support the education of the students at Bloom-Vernon Elementary School including, but not limited to, all of the students in grades pre-school through sixth grade, teachers, and other school personnel. It is the intention of this PTO to function as a non-profit organization and to raise funds through activities approved by its members and endorsed by the school. Such funds shall be used for, but not limited to, upgrading the school facilities, purchasing equipment and supplies necessary for the education of students, to provide a higher quality educational program, funding of educational field trips, academic awards, and any other school educational activity approved by its membership.
What it reported doing in 2024
In order to raise funds for Bloom-Vernon Elementary, we provided a book fair, flower sale, Fall fundraiser, pumpkin, mum and apple sales, secret santa and t-shirt sales.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 55% for direct work, and 45% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 43
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.9%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 74.7%; rating input score 75
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.7%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.3; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.2% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 0.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 12.7% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.9% of revenue deployed · 74.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $29K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2014 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.