Blind Babies Foundation Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 941156630
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2009–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990 2013
- Location
- Oakland, CA, USA
- Phone
- 5104462229
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Eye Diseases, Blindness and Vision Impairments
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $759,656
- Expenses
- $770,200
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DOROTHY BRIDGE (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DAVID HARTMAN (EXEC DIR-INT): $41,831 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
When an infant or preschool child is identified as blind or visually impaired, blind babies foundation provides family-centered services to support the child's optimal development and access to the world.
What it reported doing in 2013
Blind babies foundation (bbf), currently a program of junior blind (jb), is a leading expert in early childhood vision loss, with more than 65 years of experience in the field. Similarly, for 65 years, blind babies foundation and junior blind have shared the same vision to enable families of infants and preschoolers who are blind or visually impaired to encourage greater independence by intervening early and helping their children maximize their strengths. Bbf and jb have been partners for several years and most recently shared office space when the jb transition and rehab program launched in 2012. Please see schedule o for further information blind babies foundation (bbf), currently a program of junior blind (jb), is a leading expert in early childhood vision loss, with more than 65 years of experience in the field. Similarly, for 65 years, blind babies foundation and junior blind have shared the same vision to enable families of infants and preschoolers who are blind or visually impaired to encourage greater independence by intervening early and helping their children maximize their strengths. Bbf and jb have been partners for several years and most recently shared office space when the jb transition and rehab program launched in 2012. While working together, it became clear a merger would enable the agencies to double the impact of services for families of children with vision loss. Jb would also support administrative and accounting functions through their la office. Therefore, with aligned goals and missions, a plan was developed to merge agencies in july 2014. At bbf, our highly-trained vision impairment specialists (vis) provide family-centered services in the natural environment of the family home, in the child's early childhood program and through accompaniment on important medical visits to encourage the child's optimal development, with careful attention to individual abilities and needs. When a child is born with vision loss or is blind, his developmental needs are far more complex and require highly-specialized intervention services to get a good start in life. These essential early services help to enhance available vision, teach essential blindness skills as necessary, and promote full sensory development of other faculties and skills, often preventing a further decline of visual acuity or total vision loss.as soon as a visual impairment is detected, bbf is called upon to helpfamilies move from crisis to understanding, acceptance andself-sufficiency. Throughout northern and central California bbf's vision impairment specialists train hundreds of families and professionals each year-from head start staff to teachers, health care providers and family members-all of whom address the unique needs of the children and must know how vision loss affects child development in order to tailor interventions to meet their needs. Blind babies foundation also lectures in teacher preparation programs at san francisco state university, santa clara university and local community colleges. Bbf has been known in the field of pediatric ophthalmology as a thoughtful leader and model agency. Under bbf leadership, a ground breaking national registry of early childhood vision loss was developed called babies count, the data of which is utilized by medical and education communities throughout the country. Among the 28 us states currently participating, blind babies foundation is one of the primary providers of data to the registry. Blind babies foundation is also part of a key national group, the international preschool seminarcomprised of 32 representatives of universities, research institutions, direct service agencies and schools for the blind, who meet regularly to collaborate and develop industry best practices. It is through these local, regional, national and international collaborations that blind babies foundation, a program of junior blind, has proudly shaped andcontributed to best practices in the field of early childhood visi
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 61% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 70
- Transparency & Controls: 87
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.7%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Fundraising efficiency: $4.92 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.4%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 5.4%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -13.7% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -50.6% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.7% of revenue deployed · 74.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $577K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $42K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 30 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2009 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 20/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.