Blazing River Arts Group Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 475584491
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2023
- Location
- Lakewood, OH, USA
- Phone
- 6146238324
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Music Groups, Bands, Ensembles
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $86,049
- Expenses
- $58,633
- Assets
- $92,771
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BRAD SPECK (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JAMES CORDLE (TREASURER)
- BRAD SPECK (PRESIDENT)
- WILLIAM LEGARE (VICE PRESIDE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The cleveland pride band creates an authentic space for lgbtq+ and allied musicians to promote community, visibility, education and engagement through music performance. We welcome musicians of all skill levels, ages, and identities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Cleveland pride band provides a marching band each summer for the cleveland pride festival in june with close to 100 memberas and preforming for the thousand of people in attendance for the parade and festival. Members gain education through rehearsing and working with qualified staff on musicianship and parade marching. The marching also serves as a tool for community outreach for the lgbt community while providing entertainment and education on lgbt culture and music for audience members.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 62% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 62
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 68.4%; rating input score 68
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 31.9%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.58; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 62.3% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 19.6% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 33.4% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 68.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.