Blair-taylor Youth Sports Association I

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
990688770
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Blair, WI, USA
Phone
6083868571
Rating
35
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Recreation& Sports N.E.C.

Reported finances

Revenue
$36,881
Expenses
$43,908
Assets
$38,990
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DANIELLE PETERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DILLON SYLLA (VICE PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • SIERRA OVERLIEN (SPORTS DIRECTOR)
  • DANIELLE PETERSON (PRESIDENT)
  • DILLON SYLLA (VICE PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the btysa is to promote the highest ideals of sportsmanship and fellowship by providing fun, recreation and competition through voluntary participation. The btysa will do its best to develop athletic skills, social skills, education and fair play. The secondary importance is the winning of the game.btysa is organized exclusively for charitable, recreational and/or educational purposes under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promote physical, mental and emotional development of youth through participation in organized sports. We provide structured athletic programs that emphasize teamwork, discipline, leadership and sportsmanship. All activities are designed to be inclusive and accessible regardless of participants backgrounds or financial circumstances. Btysa does not operate for profit and no part of its net earnings benefit private individuals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 77% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -19.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.89; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.