Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
202897110
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025
Location
Bethesda, MD, USA
Phone
3012159099
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$6,772,678
Expenses
$7,014,426
Assets
$16,596,994
Liabilities
$1,711,791

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

23 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MERI-MARGARET DEOUDES (CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • MERI-MARGARET DEOUDES (CEO): $412,386 total reported compensation
  • ANDREA MADDOX-SMITH (SENIOR ADVISOR): $218,850 total reported compensation
  • CHRIS MANNINA (DIRECTOR OF FINANCE): $204,167 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To increase public awareness about bladder cancer, to advance bladder cancer research, and to provide educational and support services for the bladder cancer community.

What it reported doing in 2025

Walk to end bladder cancerthe walk to end bladder cancer is bcan's signature awareness event and primarily takes place in may. The walk unites bladder cancer survivors, loved ones, and the medical community to promote recognition and understanding of the disease. In 2025, bcan had over 3,500 participants register to walk across the united states excluding the participants bcan hosted virtually.advocacyas the voice for the patient community, bcan participates in coalitions and works with other membership groups to weigh in on policy issues that directly impact those living with bladder cancer. Bcan provides the bladder cancer community with the opportunity to build connections, identify bladder cancer state and national legislative issues of importance, and learn best practices for raising awareness of bladder cancer within communities.patient and volunteer supportbcan is a grassroots organization and volunteers are an important part of patient outreach. Bcan continues to expand its volunteer programs which were formalized in 2014.- survivor 2 survivor matches newly diagnosed patients with other survivors who have had a similar experience. Through these personal connections, newly diagnosed patients learn more about living with bladder cancer and treatment options. Other programs that have been added include:- the bladder cancer call center in collaboration with the oncology social workers from cancercare.- bcan's female focus online support group meeting monthly.partners in progressbcan's partners in progress program offers companies a unique opportunity to directly engage with the bladder cancer community, patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers while showcasing their commitment to advancing care and improving lives.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 95% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 66% for direct work, and 34% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 83
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 34
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 82.5%; rating input score 83
  • Program expense ratio: 78.9%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $26.03 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 3 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 50
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -3.6%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.37; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.1; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 21.7%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.1% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 12% per year; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 18.3% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 82.5% of revenue deployed · 78.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $5.5M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $412K · 23 people listed · 3 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 9 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2011 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 14/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.