Blackstone United Methodist Housing Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 202074645
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Alexandria, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036423830
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Low-Income & Subsidized Rental Housing
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $145,816
- Expenses
- $183,571
- Assets
- $962,950
- Liabilities
- $1,756,981
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DR JAMES G O'QUINN (VICE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- LARRY DICKENSON (BOARD CHAIRPERSON AND DIRECTOR): $60,000 total reported compensation
- REV ERNEST HERNDON JR (SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR): $7,200 total reported compensation
- DR JAMES G O'QUINN (VICE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR): $3,600 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Low-income elderly housing
What it reported doing in 2024
Organization provides housing for low-income elderly and/or handicapped persons. The apartments (24 units) are subsidized by a hud section 202/8 grant.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 66
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.7%; rating input score 81
- Program expense ratio: 64%; rating input score 64
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 72.7%; rating input score 73; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -25.9%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.25; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.82; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: -1.2% per year; rating input score 0; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.7% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -3.3% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.7% of revenue deployed · 64% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 11 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $118K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $60K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 17 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 2/100.