Blackhawks Sports Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 333966072
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Troy, MI, USA
- Phone
- 2489301233
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports Competitions
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,004,734
- Expenses
- $536,254
- Assets
- $469,717
- Liabilities
- $1,235
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Andrew Kaltsounis (President, Director)
- Mirnes Biscevic (Vice President, Director, Coach)
Highest reported compensation
- Mirnes Biscevic (Vice President, Director, Coach): $26,005 total reported compensation
- Esteban Sequeira (Director, Coach): $10,750 total reported compensation
- Kristy Hegner (Secretary, Director, Club Admin): $7,045 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Club dedicated to multi-sport programs for children. Our primary focus is on youth development in sports such as soccer, basketball, and running - with more expected in future years. Blackhawks offer an affordable (non-profit) alternative to the for profit youth sports models that are prevalent in our area.
What it reported doing in 2025
Our soccer program is our largest for participation, revenue, and expenses. We serve over 450 players with the season going from August 2025 to June 2026. Most of our fee collection occurs in 2025 but expenses are spread out until the end of the soccer season in June 2026. The program provided seasonal leagues, weekly practices, licensed coaching, and regional league and tournament participation. Financial assistance was provided to 10 families regardless of their ability to pay.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of voting board members are independent.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 60
- Transparency & Controls: 93
- Accountability: 23
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 50.8%; rating input score 51
- Program expense ratio: 95.9%; rating input score 96
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 0%; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 46.6%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.88; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.4%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 50.8% of revenue deployed · 95.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 0 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $514K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $26K · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 39 of 41 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D other liabilities reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.