Blackhawk Museum Formerly Behring-hofmann Educational Ins
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 680002178
- IRS 990-PF coverage
- 2009–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-PF 2013
- Location
- Danville, CA, USA
- Phone
- 9257362277
- Rating
- 48
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Museum, Museum Activities
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,552,732
- Expenses
- $1,913,553
Source: IRS Form 990-PF. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Overview
Mission
Museum, Museum Activities
What it reported funding in 2013
The foundation reported 9 grants totaling $9,929. The stated grant purposes included contributions ofadmission tickets to various schools, groups, and other for their fundraising activities., reimbursement of transporation expenses to museum, and assistance, plus 4 other reported purposes.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. The foundation's positive operating resources came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The foundation carried out 99% of its reported charitable disbursements directly.
- Includes asset-sale income: Asset-sale income is shown separately from recurring resources when classifying the revenue model.
The verdict
MIXED - The filing identifies who received its grants and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of spending goes to grants and the filing reports one or more activities that warrant closer review.
Rating breakdown
- Grant Deployment: NotEnoughData
- Cost Efficiency: 1
- Transparency: 100
- Compliance: 90
- Endowment Health: 98
Detailed rating inputs
Grant Deployment
- Grant deployment ratio: Limited
Cost Efficiency
- Grant expense ratio: 0.5%; rating input score 1; 7th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency
- Grant recipient disclosure: Yes; rating input score 100
Compliance
- Part VII-B activity disclosures: 15 of 19 controls in place; rating input score 79
- Property sale or exchange with a disqualified person: Fail
- Borrowing from or lending to a disqualified person: Fail
- Goods, services, or facilities involving a disqualified person: Fail
- Compensation paid to a disqualified person: Fail
- Assets transferred to a disqualified person: Pass
- Payment to a government official: Pass
- Uncorrected prior self-dealing: Pass
- Prior-year undistributed income: Pass
- Excess business holdings: Pass
- Investments that may jeopardize charitable purposes: Pass
- Uncorrected prior-year jeopardizing investments: Pass
- Attempt to influence legislation: Pass
- Attempt to influence an election: Pass
- Grants to individuals: Pass
- Grants to organizations: Pass
- Spending for a noncharitable purpose: Pass
- Funds received for a personal-benefit contract: Pass
- Premiums paid on a personal-benefit contract: Pass
- Prohibited tax-shelter transaction: Pass
- Filing consistency checks: 9; rating input score 100
Endowment Health
- Endowment-health comparison: 1,288.02; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Grants: 100% of grant recipient detail disclosed
- Trustees: Filed trustees detail
- Self-dealing: 100% of reviewed questions answered “No”
- Investments: 98th percentile for endowment coverage
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2009 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 14 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Cost Efficiency: Grant expense ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Compliance: Part VII-B activity disclosures: 4 of 19 not reported.