Black Teacher Collaborative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
815155921
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Atlanta, GA, USA
Phone
4048555244
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Parent/Teacher Group

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,534,690
Expenses
$1,866,691
Assets
$1,458,251
Liabilities
$80,316

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • HIEWET SENGHOR (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • HIEWET SENGHOR (PRESIDENT): $204,045 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To engage, develop, and support a collective of black educators who will ensure that black children achieve at high levels academically while simultaneously preparing them with the intellectual, social, emotional, and cultural capital to actively participate in the ongoing

What it reported doing in 2024

During fiscal year 2025, the black teacher collaborative (btc) continued advancing its mission to strengthen the professional practice, identity development, and instructional impact of black educators. Through professional learning programs, educator affinity spaces, and instructional development initiatives, btc supported educators in cultivating culturally grounded teaching practices and improving educational experiences for black students. In fy2025, btc engaged 195 educators and education leaders through a series of professional learning sessions, affinity gatherings, and instructional development programs. These initiatives created affirming professional learning environments where educators deepened their instructional practice, explored culturally grounded pedagogies, and strengthened their professional community. Btcs i3 professional learning series provided ongoing virtual sessions focused on instructional strategies, culturally responsive pedagogy, and educator well-being. Participants consistently reported strong engagement and affirmation through post-session surveys. For example, educators rated sessions 4.77 out of 5 for overall engagement, 4.92 for feeling honored as a black teacher, and 4.77 for interest in learning more about btcs pedagogical framework. Participants also reported that the sessions helped them recognize their strengths as educators and consider new instructional approaches for supporting black students. Btc also convened affinity space gatherings designed to strengthen connection, reflection, and professional growth among black educators. Survey responses highlighted the importance of interactive and collaborative learning formats, including peer dialogue, breakout discussions, and shared problem-solving. Educators consistently emphasized that these spaces supported both professional learning and personal well-being, reinforcing the value of community-centered professional development for black teachers. In addition, btc continued the k3 early literacy academy, a multi-year professional learning program supporting teachers in strengthening culturally grounded literacy instruction. Participant surveys showed strong outcomes across key measures of educator development. Educators rated the academys impact on black teacher identity at approximately 9.4 out of 10, knowledge of btcs pedagogical framework at approximately 9.0, and instructional skills aligned to the pedagogy at approximately 9.25. Participants also reported significant positive effects on educator mindset and well-being, with well-being scores averaging 9.62 out of 10. Qualitative feedback across programs further reinforced these results. Educators described btc programming as both intellectually rigorous and culturally affirming, noting that the experiences helped them implement culturally relevant curriculum materials, design more student-centered learning environments, and more intentionally connect their teaching to the cultural and intellectual traditions of black communities. Through these initiatives, btc continued building a growing network of educators committed to strengthening instructional practice, advancing culturally grounded teaching, and improving educational outcomes for black students.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 62
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 92
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 69.8%; rating input score 70
  • Program expense ratio: 57.4%; rating input score 57
  • Fundraising efficiency: $8.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 85.7%; rating input score 86; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -21.6%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.78; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.9%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -12.8% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -3.1% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 69.8% of revenue deployed · 57.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 6 of 7 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $204K · 7 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 32 of 32 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2019 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 34/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.