Black Students of California United
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 815459940
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2021–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Fresno, CA, US
- Phone
- 1(916) 794-2728
- Rating
- 73
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Youth Development Programs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $849,651
- Expenses
- $653,950
- Assets
- $533,084
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
9 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ADONAI MACK (PRESIDENT)
- ANGELIA BARFIELD (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- MARIANNA HARRIS (BOARD MEMBER)
- VINCE BAILEY (BOARD MEMBER)
- MIKI TURNER (BOARD MEMBER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster success among California students and their communities through culturally responsive leadership training, civic engagement, project-based learning, and multi-generational collaboration.
What it reported doing in 2024
1. Leadership conference hosted on a college campus, this 3-day event brings together an average of 240 300 students and their advisors from across the state for cross-learning and networking and to elect youth senators to represent them and plan for bscus annual day of activism in their communities. The conference features knowledge building workshops and opportunities for students to showcase their artistic skills and talents, socialize and have fun. Student leaders are exposed to a college campus environment and new communities that many have never visited. 2. Black minds matter (bmm) bscu sponsors two project-based learning competitions each academic year for bsu club members. The competitions activate and mobilize them to explore student-identified issues on their campuses such as low black graduation rates, vaping, and anti-black racism and, with guidance from their club advisors and bscu-allied scholars and activists, develop feasible action plans to address these challenges. Bmm leadership development activities and convenings provide them opportunities to learn, share their knowledge and experiences in productive ways, and translate their efforts into real world solutions that results in more welcoming school environments and other positive outcomes. These projects help students learn to conduct surveys and other research strategies, lead meaningful dialogue, develop and make informative presentations, and coordinate and manage teams. 3. Education summit & selma bridge crossing jubilee bscu senators and chaperones traveled to selma, Alabama for an historical event. Students met with elected officials, visited schools and wallace community college in selma where they met with the president of the college. They learned about voter suppression, the incarceration, and the criminalization of black females. The last day they walked across the edmund pettis bridge and wen to the legacy museum
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 49
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 68
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.3%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 49.7%; rating input score 50
- Fundraising efficiency: $9,235.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 23%; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.82; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 36.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 7 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 38.3% of revenue deployed · 49.7% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $325K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 50/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.