Black Rock Middle School Home and School Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 883734650
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Villanova, PA, USA
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Student Services, Organizations of Students
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $56,933
- Expenses
- $35,412
- Assets
- $67,238
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- POORNIMA SOANS (CO-PRESIDENT)
- JILL CANTOR-BURNS (CO-PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- POORNIMA SOANS (CO-PRESIDENT)
- JILL CANTOR-BURNS (CO-PRESIDENT)
- ALYSON FILIPPONE (CO-TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The purpose of the black rock hsa is to further cooperation and understanding between the black rock middle school (brms) and the home; to enrich and strengthen quality education for all students; to connect with and work cooperatively with other district schools or organizations to work towards a common purpose; and to connect with and work cooperatively with administration to further the educational aims of the school and district. In pursuit of these goals, the hsa shall: 1. Act as a liaison between the home and the school, 2. Offer an accessible forum for presentation and discussion of school and district issues, 3. Create and maintain a sense of community within the school, 4. Advocate and support our school and families in the community, 5. Encourage, recruit, and organize parent/guardian leadership.
What it reported doing in 2024
Support and serve the school community
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 70% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 97% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 62.2%; rating input score 62
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 37.8%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.9; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 27% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 34.1% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 62.2% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.