Black Rock Community Council Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
060961675
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Bridgeport, CT, USA
Phone
2033340293
Rating
38
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Coalitions

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$14,904
Expenses
$16,273
Assets
$78,350
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • PETER SLYWKA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NINA GIBSON (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • PETER SLYWKA (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • NINA GIBSON (PRESIDENT)
  • MATTHEW MCCARTHY (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The black rock community council's (also known as brcc) mission is to promote projects in the community that will enhance the quality of life of black rock's residents and businesses. The brcc has an established track record of creating and managing programs and projects both small and large in scope over the last thirty years. These programs and projects are all funded by the various fundraising events that are held and by the annual membership fees the council collects.

What it reported doing in 2024

The brcc has an established track record of creating and managing programs and projects both small and large in scope over the last thirty years. These programs and projects are all funded by the various fundraising events that are held and by the annual membership fees the council collects.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 87% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.2%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.81; rating input score 83; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 6.4% per year; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 12.1% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2018 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 32/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.