Black Health Coalition of Wisconsin
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391691744
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Milwaukee, WI, USA
- Phone
- 4149330064
- Rating
- 67
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Public Health Program (Includes General Health and Wellness Promotion Services)
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $62,500
- Expenses
- $76,619
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JESSIE MCSWAIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- GAIL MORGAN (DIRECTOR)
- GREGORY FANNING (CHAIRMAN)
- JESSIE MCSWAIN (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The black health coalition of Wisconsin, inc. Is a group of local organizations and individuals whose collaborative goal is to address the health problems of african americans. The primary objective of the coalition is to improve the health status of african americans in the state of wi and ensure equitable and comprehensive health care for all people.
What it reported doing in 2024
The milwaukee black immunization project will develop recommendations to the state regarding immunizations and vaccines. The project entails recruiting members of the black community to participate in an educational session on the historical context of black people regarding immunizations and vaccine research; participating in a focus group relative to the subject of immunizations and/or vaccines without fear of condemnation or ridicule; and training those members who have been educated on the issues related to immunizations and vaccines to teach others. The mbip will develop an immunization coalition which will be made up of community members and community organizations.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 53
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 56.6%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 46.2%; rating input score 46
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -22.6%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -95.5% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -15.7% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -21.6% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 56.6% of revenue deployed · 46.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 2 filed program accomplishments · $35K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 46/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.