Black Cooperative Impact Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
814320957
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Los Angeles, CA, USA
Phone
3109046336
Rating
55
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Employment Procurement Assistance

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$187,657
Expenses
$271,327
Assets
$407,721

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ROBERT LEWIS (President)
  • ELIZABETH LIBBY WILLIAMS (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • JAMES ARNOLD (Chairman)
  • TIM DODD (Director)
  • DAMON HALEY (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Based on cooperative economics, BCIF is a community-based organization that provides microloans to the Black community through pooled dollars and raises awareness about the importance of economic empowerment, equity and wealth building, with a focus on SoCal communities.

What it reported doing in 2025

Promoted the importance of economic empowerment in addressing the racial wealth gap through activities such as hosting a virtual salon, participating on several panels for convening, and raising funds to build the pool of funds to deploy as microloans to Southern California based Black owned businesses.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 25
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Sustainability: 23
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 40%; rating input score 40
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -44.6%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.5; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 28.6%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 25% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.8% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 40% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2016 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 2/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.