Bjc Health System Group Return
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 753052953
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Louis, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3142862057
- Rating
- 77
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Health Systems
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $11,251,316,536
- Expenses
- $10,620,824,468
- Assets
- $7,979,787,501
- Liabilities
- $2,247,244,001
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
518 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- BJC LIEKWEG RICHARD (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
- BJH LYNCH JOHN MD (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
- SLPG MAIN MICHAEL MD (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
- HSKC DAVIS JOHN R MD (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, DIRECTOR)
- SLHKC JOHNSON JANI (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
- SLCH LOLLO TRISHA (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- BJC LIEKWEG RICHARD (PRESIDENT, DIRECTOR): $5,392,901 total reported compensation
- BJC BARTO NICK (PRESIDENT & TREASURER): $3,301,171 total reported compensation
- SLHS ESTES MELINDA (FORMER PRESIDENT, CEO): $2,880,108 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The 24 licensed hospitals and service organizations of bjc healthcare serve the healthcare needs of the residents of metropolitan st. Louis and Kansas city, mid-Missouri, eastern Kansas and southern Illinois. Based in urban, suburban, and rural communities, bjc hospitals include academic medical centers, large, and small community hospitals. Bjc's hospitals have remained in communities that other health systems abandoned leaving no public hospital. Bjc's academic medical centers serve as a critical component of the health safety net for uninsured and underinsured patients. Bjc organizations provide inpatient & outpatient care, rehabilitation, primary care, home care, hospice, long-term care, mental health, workplace and community health/wellness. Bjc organizations also support the training of future health professionals; advancement of medical research; health safety net services and emergency preparedness; community outreach and health literacy; and regional economic development.
What it reported doing in 2024
Financial assistance, unreimbursed medicaid & means-tested uncompensated care: bjc healthcare hospitals & service organizations (bjc) care for all patients, regardless of their ability to pay. Bjc provided $112.8 million in financial assistance during 2024 to patients who were unable to pay for any or all of the care they needed. Financial assistance consists of medical services given free of charge to those without insurance or with inadequate insurance who have demonstrated they are unable to pay for their care. Additionally, bjc hospitals provided $336.4 million during 2024 in unreimbursed care to medicaid patients, absorbing the shortfall between the cost of needed medical services & the reimbursement received from state programs for qualifying low-income patients. The cost of care for charity & unreimbursed medicaid patients totaled $449.2 million.bjc also absorbs the cost of caring for patients who are unable to pay their co-pays, deductibles or other health care costs for a wide range of reasons that they may or may not share with bjc. Bjc provided an estimated $12.7 million during 2024 in care to patients who, based upon an extensive analysis of zip code & other information, were presumed to have been eligible for financial assistance under the bjc policy, had financial information been provided to the organization. These patients received needed medical services and, in fact, received the equivalent of financial assistance but were not initially identified as qualifying for financial assistance.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 97% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. The filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 78
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 52
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 83.4%; rating input score 83
- Program expense ratio: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 28th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Pass
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: 98.1%; rating input score 98; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Yes; rating input score 100
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 63.6%; rating input score 64; 18th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.6%; rating input score 59; 59th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.75; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0.9%; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.4% per year; rating input score 100; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 83.4% of revenue deployed · 86.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 266 of 418 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $9.1B in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $5.4M · 518 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $554.7M reported
- Consistency: 43 of 44 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 13 filed schedules · includes major donors, foreign activity, grants, executive pay, and related organizations
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 163 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 82 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 30/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 58/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.