Bishop Gadsden Episcopal Retirement Community
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 570337132
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Charleston, SC, USA
- Phone
- 8434066298
- Rating
- 85
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Supportive Housing for Older Adults
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $83,465,142
- Expenses
- $76,730,877
- Assets
- $387,512,892
- Liabilities
- $321,681,163
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
23 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SARAH E H TIPTON (CEO/PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH E H TIPTON (CEO/PRESIDENT): $481,150 total reported compensation
- LYNNE L KERRISON (EVP/CFO): $420,539 total reported compensation
- AARON D ROOP (SR. VP): $316,094 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bishop gadsden, a life care retirement community, embraces god's call to ministry. We affirm positive living for all who live and work here. We serve with integrity. We exercise wise stewardship. We reach out with a generous spirit.
What it reported doing in 2025
Charitable giving and generous spirit programs: throughout bishop gadsden's history, a commitment to giving has been on the forefront resulting in more $14.58 million in charitable care and gifts being raised for charitable care within the community and distributed to other non-profit organizations in our local community.the charitable mission committee's nonprofit selection chair and fellow residents select a small group (5 to 7) of nonprofits from a list of around 30 nonprofit grant applicants to support each year. Led by residents, with assistance from team members of the charitable giving office, the charitable mission committee sets a fundraising goal. In 2025, this important committee disbursed $300,000 in cash. These funds were allocated as follows: sea island habitat for humanity $100,000; saint james $100,000; ferguson village community $100,000; charleston rescue $3,000. Additionally, $32,050 in in-kind items, plus 5,000 toys for habitat for humanity and toys for tots were donated. In addition to charitable causes that support outside organizations, residents and staff contribute to the strongheart employee education scholarship, with $138,073 being distributed to employees for education purposes and education debt elimination, as well as the employee assistance fund, which gave loans and grants in the net amount of $64,930. In addition, the employee assistance fund provided 85 cards and $8,500 in back-to-school funds for eligible employees.residents and staff contribute more than 5,100 volunteer hours to local and national charitable organizations, an investment of $184,314. Additionally, bishop gadsden's culinary department donated 16,000 pounds of food, equaling a gift of $23,837. Executive staff also sit on community boards such as sc council of advisors on consumer credit, leadingage sc, and we are sharing hope sc.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 88% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 91
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 60
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.9%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 84.6%; rating input score 85
- Fundraising efficiency: $9.8 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 8.1%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.05; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.83; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.8%; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.7% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.9% of revenue deployed · 84.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $64.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $481K · 23 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $7.7M reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 16 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 27/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 32/100.