Birthright of Hudson-marlborough Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
510201165
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2014
Location
Marlborough, MA, USA
Phone
5084812055
Rating
65
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$18,019
Expenses
$22,707
Assets
$31,228
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

People named in this filing

  • Rose Monti Johnson (co-director)
  • Christine Lehane (co-director)
  • Elizabeth Probst (treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Birthright of Hudson-Marlborough provides information and support to clients in need during office visits and on the phone. We provide free baby clothes, baby diapers, and baby toiletries to clients as well as free maternity clothes and gift cards for other items that they might need. We also provide free pregnancy tests.

What it reported doing in 2025

In 2025, our office was open over 140 days or over 390 hours. Volunteers helped approximately 180 clients in need during 545 office visits and 37 phone calls. We gave out 47 complete layette baskets filled with baby clothes, baby diapers, and baby toiletries. We also gave many additional baby clothes, baby diapers, and baby toiletries to clients as needed over time. And we gave out a total of 47 gift cards to clients in need to help with additional supplies. Our volunteers collectively worked over 100 additional hours outside of office hours doing other tasks that benefit the clients such as shopping for baby items, laundering and sorting baby clothes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 87% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 55
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 40
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 59.8%; rating input score 60
  • Program expense ratio: 47.5%; rating input score 47

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -26%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.38; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 43.5% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 59.8% of revenue deployed · 47.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 47/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 56/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.