Birthright of Greater Hartford Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237378225
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
East Hartford, CT, USA
Rating
95
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$158,318
Expenses
$180,062
Assets
$195,548

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

10 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Mary R McNamara (President and Board Director)
  • Margaret Cavoli (Vice-President)

People named in this filing

  • Mary R McNamara (President and Board Director)
  • Margaret Cavoli (Vice-President)
  • Thomas Lonergan (Treasurer and Board Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Crisis Pregnancy Help. Birthright of Greater Hartford Inc. offers services aid and assistance to individuals who have problems with a pregnancy and desire a positive alternative to abortion.

What it reported doing in 2025

Birthrights volunteer staff also offered community resource information and referrals. Estimate from previous year: 248 total callers. Of these 47 community assistance callers and 201 crisis pregnancy callers. Pregnancy tests were provided for 77 women and friendship counseling for 177. 91 babies born to mothers we served. 50 mothers received maternity clothing and 52 babies received baby clothing. Actual not estimated: 51 mothers assisted in purchasing cribs and 57 in purchasing car seats. 23 mothers received rent aid. Friendship counseling volunteers staffed the office 32 hrs wk and clerical and clothing volunteers 12 hrs wk.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 51% for direct work, and 49% for grants.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 97
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 93.5%; rating input score 93

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -13.7%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.09; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 9.1% per year; rating input score 100; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 9.2% per year; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 93.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $168K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 19/100.