Birmingham International Center D/b/a the International Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
630706702
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2017
Forms available
Form 990 2015, Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Birmingham, AL, USA
Phone
2052527652
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Community Celebrations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$72
Expenses
$4,785
Assets
$13,950
Liabilities
$137,903

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARTIN J CONNORS JR (PRESIDENT)
  • TANVEER PATEL (PRESIDENT-ELECT)
  • JAMES W CHILDS JR (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MAYRA DIAZ (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • MARK A FROEHLICH (IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • ROBERT BAUGH ESQ (LEGAL ADVISOR)
  • SRIDHARA GUTTI (BOARD MEMBER)
  • SARA BETH DELISLE (BOARD MEMBER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To build cultural competency and global commerce.

What it reported doing in 2017

In the past, tic has spotlighted over 30 different countries, some multiple times. These spotlights have led to the addition of significant birmingham cultural assets, such as valuable acquisitions from italy and south korea at the birmingham museum of art, the moroccan fountain on 5th avenue north in downtown birmingham, and the japanese garden tea house at the birmingham botanical gardens. Tic did not spotlight any countries during 2017. Currently, the organization is in transition and is determining whether to continue as an organization.

Operating model

Revenue model
Other-operating. 100% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 29
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -6,545.8%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.92; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 9.89; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: -90.9% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -40.3% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2016 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.