Birch Hill Cemetery
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 320207001
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2013
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2013
- Location
- Fairbanks, AK, USA
- Phone
- 9074511110
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $77,946
- Expenses
- $76,713
- Assets
- $1,519
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIRSTEN RASMUSSEN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- KIRSTEN RASMUSSEN (PRESIDENT)
- LEO J RASMUSSEN (VICE PRESIDE)
- JUDITH RASMUSSEN (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of birch hill cemetery is to maintain, preserve and enhance, for the benefit of the general public, the historical monuments and areas located within, also including the horticulture landscape of birch hill cemetery, and to provide educational outreach and to welcome community participation.
What it reported doing in 2013
To maintain, preserve and enhance, for the benefit of the general public, the historical monuments and areas located within, also including the horticulture landscape of birch hill cemetery, and to provide educational outreach and to welcome community participation.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 78
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 31
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.4%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 77.2%; rating input score 77
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.6%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.02; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -24.1% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -17.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 136.4% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.4% of revenue deployed · 77.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $59K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2012 to 2013
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 4/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.