Birch Hill Cemetery

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
274834781
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2015
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
Anchorage, AK, USA
Phone
9074511110
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$96,295
Expenses
$87,722
Assets
$9,225

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KIRSTEN RASMUSSEN (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • KIRSTEN RASMUSSEN (PRESIDENT)
  • LEO J RASMUSSEN (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JUDITH RASMUSSEN (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of birch hill cemetery is to maintain, preserve and enhance, for the benefit of the general public, the historical monuments and areas located within, also including the horticulture landscape of birch hill cemetery, and to provide educational outreach and to welcome community participation.

What it reported doing in 2015

To maintain, preserve and enhance, for the benefit of the general public, the historical monuments and areas located within, also including the horticulture landscape of birch hill cemetery, and to provide educational outreach and to welcome community participation.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 78
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 39
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 76.8%; rating input score 77
  • Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.9%; rating input score 62; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.11; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 21.3% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 19% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 170.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 76.8% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $71K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.