Bipartisan Policy Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
731628382
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, US
Phone
2022042400
Rating
87
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Research Institutes and Public Policy Analysis

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$37,835,818
Expenses
$35,378,989
Assets
$62,759,127
Liabilities
$22,097,878

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

37 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MARGARET SPELLINGS (PRESIDENT & CEO)
  • MARILYN SERAFINI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, HEALTH)
  • MATTHEW WEIL (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, DEMOCRACY)
  • MIKAEL S MACKLER (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ENERGY)
  • SHAI AKABUS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, EPP)
  • WILLIAM HOAGLAND (SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MARGARET SPELLINGS (PRESIDENT & CEO): $1,023,069 total reported compensation
  • LISEL LOY EVP COO (TREASURER): $474,547 total reported compensation
  • MICHELE STOCKWELL (PRESIDENT, BPCA): $471,827 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To help build a healthier, more resilient, and more equitable nation through bipartisan policy solutions.

What it reported doing in 2024

Health - the health program strives to develop bipartisan policies that improve public health and help move the u.s. To an affordable, equitable, accessible, high-value system of care for all. The health program focuses on the areas of cost and coverage, digital health, behavioral health, prevention, chronic care, long-term care, rural health, public health, pandemic preparedness, and health care workforce: behavioral health projectthe health program addresses the huge unmet need for mental health and substance use disorder treatment through federal policies to expand the workforce, ensure more providers participate in insurance networks, and make better use of the existing workforce through integration. This includes projects focused on implementation of the crisis care continuum, development of the unlicensed workforce, and behavioral health needs specific to rural areas.prevention projectled by its food and nutrition security task force, for the past several years, bpc's health program has identified policies that address hunger, nutrition, and health. Bpc launched a new task force for 2023 more focused on education (for providers and patients) as well as bridging the gap between healthcare entities and community-based organizations providing food and nutrition support services. In addition, the project focuses on initiatives to expand treatments for obesity (e.g. Support for the treat and reduce obesity act) as well as provide support for health programs in expanding nutrition security initiatives.chronic care projectthe health program improves person-centered care and equity for individuals with chronic, complex care needs by expanding the availability of non-medical services and addressing barriers to the full integration of care for dually eligible beneficiaries. The program also addresses the long-term care needs of the rapidly aging population through reforms to improve financing and delivery of ltss - particularly home and community-based services.rural healththe health program addresses barriers to care unique to rural areas. These issues include the long distances rural residents must often travel to access care, struggles to recruit and retain health care providers in rural areas, lack of broadband for virtual health care services, and financial challenges for rural hospitals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 94% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 83
  • Transparency & Controls: 91
  • Accountability: 97
  • Sustainability: 50
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 85.2%; rating input score 85
  • Program expense ratio: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.16 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 95%; rating input score 95; 28th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 6.5%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.77; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.35; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 5.7% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 8 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 85.2% of revenue deployed · 90.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 19 of 20 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 8 filed program accomplishments · $32.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $1M · 37 people listed · 5 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.2M reported
  • Consistency: 38 of 38 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 25 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 12 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 12/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 41/100.