Biotechnology Innovation Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
521224577
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Washington, DC, US
Phone
202-962-9200
Rating confidence
Limited

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$117,748,708
Expenses
$100,010,786
Assets
$170,089,094
Liabilities
$76,918,293

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

118 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JOHN F CROWLEY (PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • RACHEL K KING (INTERIM PRESIDENT AND CEO)
  • MICHELLE MCMURRY-HEATH (FORMER PRESIDENT AND CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • JOHN F CROWLEY (PRESIDENT AND CEO): $3,112,385 total reported compensation
  • RACHEL K KING (INTERIM PRESIDENT AND CEO): $1,675,499 total reported compensation
  • ELIZABETH CARTIER ESHAM (CHIEF SCIENCE OFFICER): $1,031,326 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

BIO is the world's largest trade association representing biotechnology companies, academic institutions, state biotechnology centers and related organizations across the United States and in more than 30 other nations. BIO's members are involved in the research and development of innovative healthcare, agricultural, industrial and environmental biotechnology products.

What it reported doing in 2024

Advocacy: biotechnology innovation organization (bio)'s advocacy efforts reflect the priorities identified by the bio board of directors and the three section governing boards.the board of directors focuses on issues of importance to all bio members, regardless of their size or technology. These cross-cutting advocacy accomplishments for the year are listed below: - safeguarded and advanced intellectual property protections, domestically and internationally.- fostered a dialogue about proactively advancing the socially responsible use of biotechnology.- promoted investment in government and academic research.- expanded outreach to foreign governments and international entities to educate on policy issues of importance to the biotechnology industry and to improve the investment and regulatory climate for biotech products.the health section advocacy accomplishments: - promoted healthcare policies that recognize both the promise and value of innovation.- advocated for a safe and predictable regulatory environment for value-based payment arrangements for drugs and biologics.- enhanced and protected patient access to innovative therapies and promoted the need for greater nondiscrimination enforcement against insurance benefit designs.- advocated for biosimilars policies that protect patient safety, promote biomedical innovation, and advance the science-based review and approval of biosimilars and interchangeable biological products.- promoted the value of u.s. Government investments in programs that improve access to immunizations and foster vaccine innovation, strengthened our ability to respond to bioterror threats or emerging infectious diseases, and encouraged development of new products to fight antimicrobial resistance (amr).- influenced improvements to the international environment for biomedical innovation and global public health preparedness.- advocated for the modernization of the clinical development paradigm.the emerging companies section advocacy accomplishments: - advanced the interest of emerging companies in capital formation and financial services policy.- advocated for fiscal policies supporting innovative emerging companies and investment in groundbreaking r&d; enhanced the voice of pre-revenue, r&d-intensive businesses- advocated for the removal of burdensome financial reporting regulations on emerging companies.the agriculture & environment section advocacy accomplishments: bio's agriculture & environment (or ag & environment) section focuses on issues related to the organization's prior food & agriculture and industrial & environment sections. These include:- advocating on initiatives that strengthen the bioeconomy; and- meeting shared goals related to societal challenges such as food security, national security and climate change.the ag & environment section advocates and coordinates directly with government and industry stakeholders to increase the understanding and acceptance of biotech innovation, while also improving the regulatory and approval processes. This section promotes appropriate initiatives that support innovation, market access, and market acceptance.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 67
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: 1 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 12
    • Claims monitoring procedures: Pass
    • Requires narrative reports: Fail
    • Conducts field audits: Fail
    • May suspend future funding: Fail
    • Requires financial reports: Fail
    • Conducts site visits: Fail
    • Requires grant agreements: Fail
    • May require repayment: Fail
  • Grant itemization coverage: 84.9%; rating input score 85; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 98.8%; rating input score 99; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 15.1%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.7; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.45; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 9.8%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.2% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 85 of 86 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments
  • Leadership: top reported pay $3.1M · 118 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
  • Consistency: 14 of 16 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes foreign activity, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 111 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 76 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight: 7 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Foreign grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.