Bioplanet USA Corp

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
272249572
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
Sunny Isles, FL, USA
Phone
3056106265
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$845
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JACOBO HAIME (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
  • VICTOR QUEZADA (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • JACOBO HAIME (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)
  • GERMAN FLORES (DIRECTOR/SECRETARY)
  • VICTOR QUEZADA (DIRECTOR/PRESIDENT)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The activities of bioplanet USA corp. Are focused on generating environmental awareness on the effects of climate change, deforestation and natural disasters in forests, creating consciousness among communities to protect our planet and educating people on the benefits of importance of trees. In the process of generating awareness, the organization will encourage people to support the projects by sponsoring and participating while promoting a general social responsibility and environmental awareness.

What it reported doing in 2020

Million trees miami campaign is a community-wide effort to plant 1 million trees by 2020 to achieve a 30 percent tree canopy cover for miami-dade county. The campaign was developed by the miami-dade community image advisory board, now called neat streets miami and was born of the idea that a healthy and sustainable urban forest provides significant social, economic, and environmental benefits that fosters a high quality, livable, vibrant, and beautiful community.bioplanet's involvement entails the search for new sponsorships that result in the planting of native species in county approved sites.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 7
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -20.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -23.2% per year; rating input score 0; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -5.8% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 11 filing years from 2010 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.