Bionanomics Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
994163638
IRS 990 coverage
2024–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Fort Wayne, IN, USA
Phone
2607278922
Rating
56
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Science and Technology N.E.C.

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,528,927
Expenses
$49,225
Assets
$2,479,702
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DOUGLAS HORNER (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DOUGLAS HORNER (PRESIDENT)
  • KIMBERLY HORNER (SECRETARY/TREASURER)
  • MICHAEL MIRRO (DIRECTOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Advance accessible, community-driven research in microscopy, bioengineering, and stem education.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, bionanomics, inc. (bnx) was incorporated as a nonprofit research laboratory with a mission to advance accessible, community-driven research in microscopy, bioengineering, and stem education. Following incorporation in july, bnx acquired several major pieces of equipment including a laser scanning confocal microscope, a laser cell microdissector, an atomic force microscope (afm), two haptic feedback controllers, and two robotic armsto support research initiatives. Bnx began culturing and imaging caenorhabditis elegans as a model system and developed a suite of internal protocols, including standard operating procedures for instrumentation and lab safety. To promote transparency and public engagement, bnx launched a youtube channel to livestream time-lapse imaging experiments and share regular lab updates and facility tours. Student interns played a central role in designing and building the livestreaming system, integrating hardware and open-source software to connect our microscopes to the internet. Bnx also partnered with a senior capstone engineering team from purdue university fort wayne (pfw) to develop a custom co incubator, laying the foundation for future mammalian cell culture projects. Complementing the research mission, bnx significantly expanded stem access across northeast Indiana. Bnx sponsored educators to launch five new rookie robotics teams within fort wayne community schools, providing tools, parts, and mentorship to support team development and competition readiness. Bnx also funded travel expenses for student teams attending state and world robotics competitions, including support for coaches traveling to the world championship in houston. To ensure equitable access to high-quality training and practice, bnx purchased a full-size robotics practice field and secured space at electric works, making the facility available to all northeast Indiana schools for the upcoming season. Together, these efforts in 2024 marked a foundational year for bnx, advancing both scientific discovery and inclusive stem education throughout the region.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 24
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 70
  • Sustainability: 98
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 1.8%; rating input score 2
  • Program expense ratio: 70.1%; rating input score 70
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 2 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 29
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Fail
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Fail
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 98.1%; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 50.37; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 1.8% of revenue deployed · 70.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 3 of 3 board members independent · 2 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $35K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 18 of 18 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 2/100.
  • High — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 6 not reported.