Biocom California
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 330496646
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Diego, CA, USA
- Phone
- 8584550300
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $14,062,408
- Expenses
- $15,029,954
- Assets
- $14,899,695
- Liabilities
- $15,020,411
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
77 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOSEPH D PANETTA (PRESIDENT/CEO & DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JOSEPH D PANETTA (PRESIDENT/CEO & DIRECTOR): $1,263,315 total reported compensation
- JIMMY JACKSON (SVP & CHIEF POLICY OFFICER): $585,292 total reported compensation
- JULIE AMES (VP CORPORATE COMMUNICATION): $501,318 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Accelerating life science success.
What it reported doing in 2024
Biocom, representing all of southern California, is the largest, most successful regional life science association in the world. Through our many initiatives, our member companies have a stronger, unified voice in matters of public policy, workforce development, capital development and group buying power. Our members are connected and through our communication channels, visible on a national and global level. In the last year, we have worked to strengthen relationships and open lines of communication with the fda. This dialogue is helping.capital development:- continued to identify ways to raise California's visibility on a national and international level.- grew business development focused networking events to further connect to the community in California. - grew the global partnering conference committee.public policy:- hosted congressional briefings on life science topics.- significant work in the legislative areas of patent reform, device tax repeal and nih funding.- hosted high level policy makers and regulators.- engaged strongly on legislation at the state level, particularly on legislation affecting public disclosure of proprietary pricing information.- key stakeholder in development of regional water policy.communications:- biocom is dedicated to promoting our member companies and their successes, while keeping membership apprised of the latest industry news.events & initiatives:- organized multiple trips to japan and had a biocom/California presence at the bio japan convention in tokyo.- held a successful partnering conference and celebration of life annual dinner.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 73% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 56
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 18
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 95.7%; rating input score 96; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 56
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.9%; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.99; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.01; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 25.4%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 11.1% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.4% per year; rating input score 100; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 22 of 23 board members independent · 5 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $1.3M · 77 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $3.2M reported
- Consistency: 11 of 11 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes foreign activity and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 14/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 6/100.