Bioboat Corporation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
464710194
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Brooklyn, NY, USA
Phone
9145061120
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Natural Resources Conservation and Protection

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$5,837
Expenses
$5,871
Assets
$51,970
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • STEPHEN FLEMING (PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
  • WILLIAM T LIVINGSTON IV (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)

People named in this filing

  • STEPHEN FLEMING (PRESIDENT/SECRETARY)
  • WILLIAM T LIVINGSTON IV (VICE PRESIDENT/TREASURER)
  • DR PAUL BILLETER (SCIENCE ADVISOR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bioboat's mission is to bring science to all school children and provide an opportunity for meaningful experiential learning by participating in the scientific research community, building the next generation of environmental stewards and socially responsible citizens.

What it reported doing in 2025

Bioboat's mission is to build the next generation of environmental stewards through marine science education. It is estimated that only 30 % of schoolchildren living in New York city's five boroughs have ever visited the water's edge, much less experienced the delicate balance of life existing below the surface. Bioboat is dedicated to getting these future protectors of our water out on the water. Using a variety of chartered vessels, schoolchildren are given a meaningful opportunity to experience scientific research while navigating the hudson river, jamaica bay, pelham bay, and surrounding estuaries. Too many schools lack the resources and physical lab space to provide experiential science education to their students. However, with a team of dedicated educators and volunteers aboard a mobile classroom, docking near schools, the expenses of bus transportation, laboratory equipment, and technology are lessened. Educational trips are designed to give students the opportunity to collect and share data in collaboration with influential research organizations. Careers in the maritime industry are highlighted, allowing students to consider futures in engineering, building, and navigation. Excursions typically last 3 hours and introduce students to current research occurring in the ecosystem while giving them hands-on experience with scientific equipment. Students study: trophic levels and food webs, migration patterns upriver and downriver, the billion oyster project, life in a tidal zone, creatures that make their home in the eelgrass, the effect of man-made river structures on plant and animal life, microplastics in the water, the connection between sewers and rivers, the future of coastlines as sea levels rise, how climate change introduces invasive species and algae blooms, safe recreational use of the river and bay, and sustainable fishing.past successes include partnering with the world wildlife federation to provide excursions for local students in pelham bay and the kingsborough community college yesss! To provide young new yorkers the opportunity to explore their home seas aboard the rv cuny i vessel, discovering in their own city a hidden wilderness - estuaries and beaches that truly define ny as a water city

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Expenses are high relative to revenue and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 60
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 65.4%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 65.1%; rating input score 65

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -0.6%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.85; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 30.3% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 30.1% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 47.1% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 65.4% of revenue deployed · 65.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $4K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 6 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.