Binge Eating Disorder Assoc Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 262945694
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2016
- Forms available
- Form 990 2016, Form 990-EZ 2011, Form 990-N 2009
- Location
- Severna Park, MD, USA
- Phone
- 8558552332
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $368,259
- Expenses
- $423,358
- Assets
- $3,330
- Liabilities
- $67,578
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHEVESE TURNER (CEO AND PRES)
Highest reported compensation
- CHEVESE TURNER (CEO AND PRES): $73,187 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2016. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Support individuals suffering from binge eating disorders.
What it reported doing in 2016
Outreach education - delivered presentations to schools, universities, and professional groups conferences - education for professionals and individuals suffering from binge eating disorders
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 65
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 10
- Sustainability: 11
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 76.6%; rating input score 77
- Program expense ratio: 66.6%; rating input score 67
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: Limited
- Governance controls: 2 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 25
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.01; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 20.29; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 66.7% per year; rating input score 100; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 40.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 76.6% of revenue deployed · 66.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 2 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $282K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $73K · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2012 to 2016
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 24/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.