Bikur Cholim Bergen County

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
813521812
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Teaneck, NJ, USA
Phone
2015793066
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services
Affiliation
Judaism

Reported finances

Revenue
$71,162
Expenses
$76,762
Assets
$50,539
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

3 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MEREDITH YAGER (PRESIDENT)
  • TSIPORA GURELL (VICE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY)

People named in this filing

  • MEREDITH YAGER (PRESIDENT)
  • TSIPORA GURELL (VICE PRESIDENT, SECRETARY)
  • NANCY NEFF (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of the organization is to provide services for members of the jewish community experiencing hardship and illness, primarily in the bergen county, New Jersey area, allowing these families and individuals to focus their attention on dealing with the issues affecting them and their loved ones.

What it reported doing in 2024

Food and lodging were provided to family members of hospitalized individuals, specifically over the jewish sabbath when traveling to and from hospitals is prohibited. Taxis and other forms of transportation were provided to assist individals needing to go to hospitals or for medical visits who cannot do so on their own. Provisions were provided when parents were unable to remain at home due to having to deal with illness or other hardship in the family. Volunteers assisted with errands for families in need and assistance for single family households.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 41
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.9%; rating input score 33; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.66; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 67th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -6% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 33/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.