Bikedenver
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 201082565
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2018–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2008
- Location
- Denver, CO, USA
- Phone
- 7205305894
- Rating
- 68
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $177,975
- Expenses
- $189,761
- Assets
- $28,946
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEX PANKONIN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALEX PANKONIN (PRESIDENT)
- KARL SCHROEDER (VICE PRESIDE)
- ANDREW ILTIS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Bikedenver is denver's bicycle advocacy organization and the leading non- profit to promote and encourage bicycling as an energy efficient, non- polluting, healthy and enjoyable transportation alternative in and around denver.
What it reported doing in 2018
Advocacy - bikedenver works with city agencies and local organizations to plan, develop and implement bicycle policy and infrastructure improvements. Bikedenver advocated for and installed the first protected bike lane, providing vertical separation between bikes and motorized vehicles.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 83% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Revenue has declined or grown slowly and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 14
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69.3%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 65%; rating input score 65
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -6.6%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.15; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 36%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -5.2% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -31.2% per year; rating input score 0; 4th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69.3% of revenue deployed · 65% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $123K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.