Bike Walk Greenville

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
462776962
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2022–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Greenville, SC, USA
Phone
8647040680
Rating
69
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community, Neighborhood Development

Reported finances

Revenue
$157,560
Expenses
$71,295
Assets
$186,774

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

People named in this filing

  • JASMINE VANADORE (EXECUTIVE DI)
  • MARY REID MCGOWAN (BOARD CHAIR)
  • WAYNE HOLLINGER (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Bike walk greenville exists to ensure that individual transportation initiatives are thoughtfully implemented and meet the diverse needs of greenville's population. Its mission is to promote the health and vitality of greenville county by advocating for connected, safe infrastructure for active transportation.

What it reported doing in 2024

We bring your community together to demonstrate the widespread benefits and potential of safe, accessible active transportation choices. Through capital and educational campaigns, we work with our citizens for a better greenville county. We act as advisors to local and state governments and advise on significant challenges in implementing infrastructure changes. We connect the community who have similar concerns and develop, educate, and facilitate community desire with actionable outcomes.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 45
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 70
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 31.2%; rating input score 31
  • Program expense ratio: 68.5%; rating input score 69

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.8%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.62; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 50.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -2.9% per year; rating input score 0; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 52.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 66.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 31.2% of revenue deployed · 68.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $49K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2022 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 31/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.