Biggest Little City Movement
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 464291009
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2015
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2015
- Location
- Reno, NV, USA
- Phone
- 7753232977
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Community, Neighborhood Development
Reported finances
- Expenses
- $2,076
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ABBI WHITAKER (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
People named in this filing
- ABBI WHITAKER (PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR)
- MATT LIPKOWITZ (TREASURER/DIRECTOR)
- COURTNEY MEREDITH (SECRETARY/DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2015. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The biggest little city movement is organized and will be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes as a "public charity" described in section 509(a)(l) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended, or successor provisions of any subsequent federal law (the "code") and the regulations promulgated thereunder as they now exist or as they may hereafter be amended (the "regulations"). The biggest little city movement is organized and will at all times be dedicated to revitalizing and enhancing the cities of reno and sparks. The biggest little city movement aims to improve the perception of the reno/sparks area by repositioning the focus on the two cities. The biggest little city movement will provide funds to support education, beautification, and spur ideas for enhancing the reno/sparks area stature and reputation through speaking events, conventions and organized dialogues.
What it reported doing in 2015
Revitalize and enhance the cities of reno and sparks, provide funds to support education, improve the perception of the cities of reno and sparks by repositioning the focus on the two cities.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Transfer-based 990-EZ. The 990-EZ reports grants or member benefits, but it does not separate enough spending to show the nonprofit’s full delivery mix.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: -200% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 2 of 2 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2014 to 2015
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 52/100.