Big Game Battle Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
264549815
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Braintree, MA, USA
Phone
7815524200
Rating
85
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Public Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$143,060
Expenses
$142,226
Assets
$22,124
Liabilities
$6,280

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

2 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DONALD F O'NEILL (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DONALD F O'NEILL (PRESIDENT)
  • JEFFREY O'NEILL (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Big game battle "bgb" is organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes. The activities of bgb are designed to raise funds to assist and enhance the quality of life for underpriviledged children and families in and around the community. Bgb has one major fundraising event annually. The foundation operates a three day sport fishing tournament in august held on the island of nantucket, Massachusetts. The tournament attracts sponsors and donors who contribute funds, services and goods. In addition to entry fees collected by bgb, the organization collects donations from the silent auction and raffle. Also, donations made out directly to the particular charity are collected at the time of the event. Bgb then makes the donation to the selected charity.

What it reported doing in 2019

The organization hosts an annual boating/fishing event, and silent auction, to raise funds for qualified charities. In 2019, the designated charity was one mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 91% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 90% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 90.7%; rating input score 91
  • Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 0.6%; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.16; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 65; 65th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 16.9% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 30.9% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 90.7% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $130K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 34/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 15/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 20/100.