Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Inland Northwest
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 916061587
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2014–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Spokane, WA, USA
- Phone
- 5093288310
- Rating
- 83
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $683,821
- Expenses
- $785,926
- Assets
- $136,020
- Liabilities
- $322,562
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
18 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHRISTOPHER CLAYTON (VICE PRESIDENT)
- CHELSEA MCEACHERN (PRESIDENT)
- KYLE WEST (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- KYLE WEST (CEO): $126,100 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.
What it reported doing in 2025
Big brothers big sisters of the inland northwest facilitated one-to-one mentoring service for approximately 151 children living in the spokane area.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 68
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 10
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 78.7%; rating input score 79
- Program expense ratio: 68.4%; rating input score 68
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.83 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -14.9%; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.17; rating input score 9; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 2.37; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 78.7% of revenue deployed · 68.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $538K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $126K · 18 people listed
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2014 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 9/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.