Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Central Gulf Coast Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
611683905
IRS 990 coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2012
Location
Mobile, AL, USA
Phone
2513440536
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$953,643
Expenses
$1,121,058
Assets
$1,305,838
Liabilities
$191,054

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

15 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • AIMEE RISSER (CEO/PRESIDEN)

Highest reported compensation

  • AIMEE RISSER (CEO/PRESIDEN): $154,166 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To create and support one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth.

What it reported doing in 2024

Big brothers big sisters of the central gulf coast is the local leader in quality youth mentoring services. We hold ourselves accountable for and are able to measure specific youth outcomes that indicate that when matched with a big, our littles achieve success in school, are better able to avoid risky behaviors such as getting into fights and trying drugs and alcohol, and improve their self-confidence and academic performance. Our program serves children ages 6 to 18 in mobile, baldwin, Washington, clarke, escambia, and monroe counties in Alabama. The program also serves children ages 6 to 18 in jackson, harrison, and hancock counties in Mississippi. Once a match is created between a big and a little, our organization provides ongoing professional supportfor the duration of their match or until the little turns 18 or graduates from high school. Our matches served during our school-based program for 2024 resulted in the following outcomes: - 86% of littles stayed on track with or improved academic performance and grades. - 84% of littles decreased of maintained depressive symptoms. - 76% of littles kept or created plans for high school graduation and beyond. - 78% of littles kept a strong or increased sense of family/parental connectedness. - littles improved or maintained avoidance of risky behaviors such as juvenile justice contact (100%), bullying (89%), school discipline (87%), status offenses and illegal activity (91%), and substance abuse (97%). - 85% of littles have or developed sparks, activities & interests that are important to them and have an important adult to help them develop. - 73% of littles reported a strong or increasing level of school connectedness. - 81% of littles reported a strong or increasing level of social competence. During the year, children matched with a mentor for one year in our community-based program resulted in the following outcomes: - 77% of littles stayed on track with or improved academic performance and grades. - 85% of littles decreased of maintained depressive symptoms. - 93% of littles kept or created plans for high school graduation and beyond. - 72% of littles kept a strong or increased sense of family/parental connectedness. - littles improved or maintained avoidance of risky behaviors such as juvenile justice contact (92%), bullying (93%), school discipline (90%), status offenses and illegal activity (100%), and substance abuse (97%). - 82% of littles have or developed sparks, activities & interests that are important to them and have an important adult to help them develop. - 81% of littles reported a strong or increasing level of school connectedness. - 94% of littles reported a strong or increasing level of social competence. Our "littles" have many challenges to overcome, including poverty, negative influences from peers, and poor academic performance. Big brothers big sisters of the central gulf coast helps the children we serve overcome these obstacles by providing a thoroughly screened and trained, caring adult to serve as a "big" brother or "big" sister, who serves as a mentor, guide and friend so that the child can have someone that they can share new experiences with, confide in, and receive additional support and guidance from. Our services are offered at no cost to our community's most vulnerable families. Those that invest in our mission enable us to conduct background checks on volunteers to ensure child safety, and provide ongoing professional support for children, families and volunteers to build and sustain long-lasting relationships; a key to successful mentoring.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 85% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 93.7%; rating input score 94
  • Program expense ratio: 79.5%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $5.19 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17.6%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.16; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.15; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13.8%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 7.8% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.7% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 93.7% of revenue deployed · 79.5% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 14 of 14 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $891K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $154K · 15 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 18/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 11/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 37/100.