Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southwest Washington
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911225443
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Olympia, WA, USA
- Phone
- 3609430409
- Rating
- 82
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $914,938
- Expenses
- $992,791
- Assets
- $283,313
- Liabilities
- $118,724
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
17 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JUSTIN HJELM (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- KEITH ANN CAMPBELL (EXECUTIVE DI): $28,802 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Our mission is to provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one mentoring relationships, changing their lived for the better, forever. Our vision is that all children achieve success in life. Our purpose is to provide positive youth development programs that focus on friendship, educational support, social skill enhancement, workplace readiness skills and guidance to youth.
What it reported doing in 2024
Big brothers big sisters of southwest Washington is a local affiliate of our national organization founded in 1904. We have been making one-to-one mentoring relationships between teen and adult volunteer mentors and children/youth, 6-18 years of age, since 1985. Bbbs provides research-based, professionally supported mentoring programs at both schools sites and in the community for children and youth across a five county area: thurston, lewis, pacific, grays harbor and mason counties. We partner with school districts, after-school programs, community groups and community members to connect children and youth with mentors to make sure they receive the support they need to be successful in school and life. Big brothers big sisters of southwest Washington offers several high quality programs to meet community needs. With input from the little's family and school personnel, the mentoring is focused so that the little receive the maximum support in the areas they need the most. All matches are carefully administered by big brothers big sisters staff members following strict background and interview standards to ensure the match between the big and little is safe and well-suited to the individual child's needs, as well as harmonious and built to last. Big brothers big sisters programs include: (1) bigs in schools program: our bigs in school program is designed to foster youth's academic development and enhance their social-emotional skills. Students, referred by teachers and school counselors, are struggling in school, lack social skills or have problem behaviors such as aggressiveness, chronic absenteeism, or skipping classes. Adult and high school mentors (bigs) are recruited from local high schools, colleges, and the local community, are matching with children and youth, ages 6-13 years of age. Student and their mentors meet between 30-60 minutes each week at a designated school or after-school site, under the direct supervision of a bbbs staff member. Matches participate in activities that reflect their mutual interests and hobbies, such as arts and crafts, homework and educational enrichment activities, steam (science, technology, engineering, arts and math) projects, organized games and sports, and board games. Mentors offer students time and attention on a consistent basis, promoting positive peer and adult relationships, a positive attitude, enhances self- confidence, and academic encouragement. (2) bigs in the community: our bigs in community program offers the opportunity for children and youth, ages 6-18 years of age, and their mentors to spend time together in their local communities. A big and little are matched based on shared interests and individual child's needs. Bigs meet with their littles on evenings and weekends to participate in such activities as homework help, sharing a meal together, or attending local museums, theatre, and sporting events. During match outings, filled with conversation and shared activities, bigs and littles develop a relationship to help manage their everyday challenges of growing up. (3) mentor connections: our mentor connections program focuses on military-connected students in elementary and middle school grades to help them cope with the stress of parental deployment and frequent moves. Specially trained bigs meet with the military-connected littles weekly during school hours to share lunch and participate in fun and learning activities. (4) mentor u is a high school mentoring program focusing on college readiness, workforce development, career exploration and social-emotional learning. The program is an innovative approach that provides on-to-one mentoring to high school youth, blending technology with a curriculum and activities that are intentionally designed to meet a high school student's needs, using a framework based on the skills students need to graduate from high school, be ready for post-high school success. And achieve success in life. Students participate in a weekly class
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 22
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 84.8%; rating input score 85
- Program expense ratio: 78.1%; rating input score 78
- Fundraising efficiency: $2.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -8.5%; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.29; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.42; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 2.9%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 41st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 33rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 84.8% of revenue deployed · 78.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 16 of 16 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $775K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $29K · 17 people listed
- Consistency: 33 of 33 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 6/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 13/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Form 990 shared with the board not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 19/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.