Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southeastern New Mexic
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 850467490
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Roswell, NM, USA
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $310,749
- Expenses
- $329,158
- Assets
- $98,375
- Liabilities
- $26,683
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- WILLIAM WOLF (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER)
- JONATHAN ROEHLK (VICE PRESIDENT)
- LORRINA SEGOVIA (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- WILLIAM WOLF (CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER): $61,020 total reported compensation
- AMANDA WARE (PROGRAM DIRECTOR): $54,271 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since the year 2000, bbbs senm has been matching youth in meaningful, enduring, professionally supported one-to-one mentoring relationships with screened adult volunteers who defend their potential and help them achieve their biggest possible futures.
What it reported doing in 2020
The organization enrolls youth ages 6-17 to be matched in a one-to-one mentoring relationship. Our services are offered completely free of charge. In 2020-21, we served 47 youth in mentoring matches, 82% of whom were children of color, including african american and hispanic youth. Of the children we served, 50% were living with grandparents or in single parent households; 45% came from families that received income assistance; and 68% were on free or reduced lunch at school. Our volunteers spent an estimated 2,112 hours mentoring children in fy 2020-21. Independent research proves that children in our one-to-one mentoring programs are more likely to graduate from high school, are less likely to use drugs, have improved self-confidence, and have better, stronger relationships with their families and others.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 70% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 19
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 85.6%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 80.8%; rating input score 81
- Fundraising efficiency: $17.07 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.9%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.3; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.27; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 35%; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 5.1% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.6% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.8% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 85.6% of revenue deployed · 80.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $266K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $61K · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 26 of 26 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 48/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 26/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 22/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.