Big Brothers Big Sisters of Racine and Kenosha Counties Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391052882
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2018–2022
Forms available
Form 990 2017, Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Kenosha, WI, USA
Phone
2626377625
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$121,524
Expenses
$132,939
Assets
$12,717

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RONALD TATUM (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • RONALD TATUM (PRESIDENT)
  • DANIELLE JOHNSON (VICE PRESIDE)
  • AUNTAVIA JACKSON (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The big brothers big sisters of racine and kenosha counties is dedicated to establishing successful mentoring relationships for all children who need and want them, contributing to better schools, brighter furures, and stronger communities for all.

What it reported doing in 2022

The purpose of big grothers big sisters is to organize, under professional direction, mature, responsible and carefully screened individuals to provide, on a volunteer basis, a one-to-one mentoring relationship to children and youth who lack stable relationships with adults. The agency, through its volunteers and staff, will provide companionship, guidance and a positive role model to these children to help them reach their academic, social and emotional goals.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 88% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 86
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 12
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 88.8%; rating input score 89
  • Program expense ratio: 81.2%; rating input score 81

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -9.4%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.1; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 29.3%; rating input score 13; 13th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -11.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -6.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -16.8% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 88.8% of revenue deployed · 81.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $108K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 4 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2018 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 13/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.