Big Brothers - Big Sisters of Mahoning Valley Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
341139677
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2019
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2019
Location
Girard, OH, USA
Phone
3305450002
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Reported finances

Revenue
$76,743
Expenses
$78,142
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • JAMES STALLSMITH (PRESIDENT)
  • KRISTEN OLMI (VICE-PRESIDENT)
  • BRIAN HIGGINS (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

People named in this filing

  • DALE STANDLEY (BOARD MEMBER)
  • JAMES STALLSMITH (PRESIDENT)
  • PATTY RYSER (TREASURER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To make a difference in the lives of children

What it reported doing in 2019

To make a positive difference in the lives of children primarilythrough a professionally supported one-on-one mentoringrelationship with a caring volunteer.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 88% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 20
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 81.5%; rating input score 81
  • Program expense ratio: 80%; rating input score 80

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -1.8%; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 38.1%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -3.9% per year; rating input score 0; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -3.5% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.5% per year; rating input score 0; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 81.5% of revenue deployed · 80% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $63K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 17 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2013 to 2019
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 41/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.