Big Brothers Big Sisters of Eastern Missouri

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
430669085
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-T 2025
Location
Saint Louis, MO, USA
Phone
3143615900
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$7,395,265
Expenses
$7,048,585
Assets
$23,740,363
Liabilities
$321,967

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

28 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • KRISTEN SLAUGHTER (CEO/PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • KRISTEN SLAUGHTER (CEO/PRESIDENT): $223,360 total reported compensation
  • QUINTON CLAY (VP MARKETING & COMMUNICATIONS): $141,708 total reported compensation
  • ASHLEY SEILER (CHIEF PARTNERSHIP OFFICER): $141,577 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To partner with young people in their pursuit of a meaningful, stable and independent life.

What it reported doing in 2025

Bbbsemo provides multiple programs and services designed to empower young people, ages 5-25, in partnership with volunteers, parents, school districts, and collaborative partner organizations across our service region. For 112 years, we have connected young people with mentors, encouraging them to remain in school and pursue successful futures. Each year, we engage 10,000+ young people through the following programs and initiatives: continued on schedule oyouth mentoring - our mentoring programs include: (1) one-to-one mentoring - one child is matched with one volunteer mentor; (2) group mentoring - up to 20 youth are matched with a bbbsemo professional staff mentor and meet in groups at their schools; and (3) upward mentoring - up to 15 youth are matched with professional mentors and meet regularly within their communities (one-on-one and group interactions).alumni mentoring - continuous support for young adults, 18-25, who graduate from our mentoring programs, then opt to remain connected with bbbsemo as they transition to post-secondary education, employment, and/or the military. Abctoday schools - staff work directly with parents, schools, and community partners, empowering 8,000+ students to improve their attendance, behavior, and course performance outcomes in reading and math.systems navigation & direct temporary aid - we help families access the supportive services they need, increasing their stability and reducing the likelihood of homelessness. This work has continued to expand, including providing temporary financial assistance, when possible (provided by various funding partners).

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 75
  • Transparency & Controls: 89
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 53
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.4%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 79.1%; rating input score 79
  • Fundraising efficiency: $15.26 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.1%; rating input score 94; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Pass
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 4.7%; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.37; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 13%; rating input score 26; 26th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 3.2% per year; rating input score 100; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 5.6% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.4% of revenue deployed · 79.1% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 22 of 22 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $223K · 28 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 37 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 6 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 50/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 26/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.