Big Brothers Big Sisters of Dodge County and Watertown Community Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 391578185
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2011–2017
- Forms available
- Form 990 2010, Form 990-EZ 2017
- Location
- Watertown, WI, USA
- Phone
- 9202612315
- Rating
- 71
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $89,270
- Expenses
- $114,820
- Assets
- $81,733
- Liabilities
- $6,976
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
11 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Jeff Roberts (President)
People named in this filing
- Betsy Bright (Executive Dir.)
- Brian Pfintzinger (Director)
- Jennifer Borst (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Mission of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Dodge County & Watertown Community is to help children reach their potential through professionally supported, one-on-one relationships with mentors who have a measurable impact on youth.
What it reported doing in 2017
Matching of Volunteer Adult with Child to provide guidance and friendship
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 23
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.9%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 58.2%; rating input score 58
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -28.6%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.71; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 36.5%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0.8% per year; rating input score 0; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.9% of revenue deployed · 58.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $67K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 7 filing years from 2011 to 2017
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 58/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 39/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 5/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 24/100.