Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Mn
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 410972056
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- St Cloud, MN, USA
- Phone
- 3202584510
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,698,394
- Expenses
- $1,409,836
- Assets
- $5,098,576
- Liabilities
- $219,929
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALEX SCHOEPHOERSTER (PRESIDENT)
- RICK ROEHL (VICE PRESIDENT)
- JACKIE SCHOLL JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- JACKIE SCHOLL JOHNSON (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $130,167 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Big brothers big sisters of central Minnesota creates and supports one-to-one mentoring relationships that ignite the power and promise of youth. We serve young people across our region, matching them with caring mentors who provide guidance, friendship, and stability. We are committed to addressing community needs by strenghtening resilience, improving outcomes, and empowering youth to thrive.
What it reported doing in 2024
In our 56th year of service, we matched over 500 youth with mentors, marking a 10-year high in youth served across our community-based and school/site-based programs. More than 90% of our youth reported improved confidence, stronger relationships, and better academic engagement. In 2025, we continued to build on long-term impact with new and expanded programming, partnerships, and resources:- we strengthened our focus on long-term impact by advancing our $10 million "for kids, forever" endowment campaign, aimed at securing mentoring services for generations to come.- bigs on campus, our award-winning mentoring model, brings littles to the campuses of st. Cloud state university, the college of saint benedict/saint john's university, and st. Cloud technical & community college to meet with mentors, tour academic departments, and envision their futures in higher education.- big partners, a collaboration with isd 742 and granite partners, pairs local high school students with business professionals to explore career pathways and post-secondary options.- over 200 high school students served as high school bigs/mentors, helping them develop leadership skills while making a real impact on their younger peers.- college & career readiness programs served over 250 youth and awarded over $40,000 in exclusive scholarships.all matches are carefully monitored and supported by trained program staff who work with youth, families, and mentors to develop individualized goals and provide trauma-informed support. Volunteer contributions: our work is made possible by over 800 volunteers- serving as bigs, board members, committee members, and event volunteers. Our volunteers offer stability, consistency, and hope to youth facing adversity. While our bigs provide direct mentorship to youth, our non-mentor volunteers play a critical role in guiding and strengthening our program through leadership, advocacy, and community engagement. They help shape our strategic direction, support events, and amplify our mission in the broader community. This year, we deepened partnerships with local businesses and groups to recruit new mentors and expand community awareness. Governance and strategic direction: big brothers big sisters of central Minnesota is governed by a diverse and active board of directors that provides strategic leadership, ensures transparency, legal compliance, and financial accountability. We adhere to strong financial management practices and participate in an annual independent audit. As an affiliate of big brothers big sisters of america, we comply with rigorous national standards and regularly assess performance for quality assurance. Our strategic plan includes ambitious goals for growth and impact, through new and broadened partnerships, expanded rural outreach, and new fundraising opportunities.public engagement and partnerships: our agency engages the broader community through storytelling, social media, local partnerships, and public events. This year, we launched a compelling storytelling initiative, spotlighting mentors, mentees, and donors, that has increased community awareness and inspired new support. Our endowment campaign video, featuring campaign chairs eric and lee hurd alongside their little brother caleb, fueled donor momentum and inspired new supporters. We actively collaborate with schools, youth-serving agencies, service clubs, and community foundations to support youth and help eliminate barriers to their success. We continue to build trust by delivering measurable impact, aligning with our donors' values, and clearly demonstrating how mentoring transforms lives.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 74% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 96% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 69
- Transparency & Controls: 94
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 69%; rating input score 69
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $10.67 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 17%; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.62; rating input score 79; 79th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.04; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 9.2%; rating input score 39; 39th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7.1% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 13.7% per year; rating input score 100; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 69% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 20 of 20 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.1M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $130K · 21 people listed
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 40/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 39/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.