Big Brothers Big Sisters of Central Arizona
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 860205254
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ, USA
- Phone
- 6023934124
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,062,674
- Expenses
- $3,892,087
- Assets
- $5,312,735
- Liabilities
- $1,354,243
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
30 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LAURA CAPELLO (PRES/ CEO-TE)
- DEBBIE CASTILLO-SMITH (PRESIDENT &)
Highest reported compensation
- LAURA CAPELLO (PRES/ CEO-TE): $133,147 total reported compensation
- JESSICA WHITNEY (VP DEVEL-TER): $101,424 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To provide quality mentors for children.
What it reported doing in 2024
Since 1955, big brothers big sisters of central Arizona (bbbs) has provided a free and unique service to families in maricopa county by providing professionally supported, one-on-one mentoring. The agency's service area expanded to gila county in 2001 and to pinal county in 2005. Bbbs offers the opportunity for a child to develop a healthy relationship with a screened and trained mentor, while also providing wraparound referral services to their families. As a primary prevention service, any child age 6-15 is eligible to apply. A majority of the children served are from single parent, low-income families. Each childmentor pairing participates in various activities such as reading, hiking, crafts, sports, and attending special agency events. Programs for youth are either community- based or site-based. In the communitybased program, volunteers pick up the child at their home and participate in fun activities throughout the community. In the site-based program, the one-to-one mentoring occurs in a group setting at a specific location, either an elementary school, an afterschool program, or a workplace. Researchers found that after 18 months of spending time with their bigs, the little brothers and little sisters, compared to those children not in our program, were: 46% - less likely to begin using illegal drugs, 52%- less likely to skip school, and 33%- less likely to hit someone. They also found that the littles were more confident of their performance in schoolwork and getting along better with their families. Our organization is dedicated to meeting the post-pandemic needs of our youth by providing increased wraparound service referrals and trainings to parents, youth mental health and wellness education, and academic support. In recent years through partnering with other youth serving organizations, we have expanded our service to specialized vulnerable populations including youth experiencing homelessness, youth in the lgbtq+ community, and youth after high school graduation. Mentorship helps youth thrive in our community, making it stronger for all.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 66
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 100
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 79.9%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 62.2%; rating input score 62
- Fundraising efficiency: $3.97 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Pass
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -27.1%; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.37; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.25; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 6%; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.6% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 79.9% of revenue deployed · 62.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 21 of 21 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.4M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $133K · 30 people listed
- Highest-paid contractors: 2 contractors listed · $251K reported
- Consistency: 35 of 35 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 5/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 47/100.