Big Brothers Big Sisters of Cass County Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
311090037
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2017
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2017
Location
Logansport, IN, USA
Phone
5747222222
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$65,523
Expenses
$58,542
Assets
$45,042
Liabilities
$774

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

13 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ADNREA NICOLES (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • BARRI CRANFILL (BOARD MEMBER)
  • BOB BROCK (BOARD MEMBER)
  • REBECCA MCVAY (EXECUTIVE DI)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2017. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of big brothers big sisters of cass county, inc. Is to provide children facing adversity with strong and enduring, professionally supported one-to-one relationships that change their lives for the better, forever. These matches are between mature and responsible men exclusively to boys, and mature and responsible women to girls and, in some circumstances, to boys who participate in the program. The matches are provided to youth who could benefit from a wholesome adult relationship that is supplemental to that which is usually provided by parents. Relationships are intended to provide companionship and guidance to help assure the proper moral, psychological, intellectual, vocational, and physical development of the participating boys and girls.

What it reported doing in 2017

The agency matches screened, trained volunteers with children from single parent families in which the absent parent has no regular contact with the child.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 47
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 77.6%; rating input score 78
  • Program expense ratio: 86.8%; rating input score 87

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 10.7%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 41; 41st percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 49.3%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -0.7% per year; rating input score 0; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.5% per year; rating input score 0; 34th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 77.6% of revenue deployed · 86.8% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $51K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 8 filing years from 2010 to 2017
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 41/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 3/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.