Big Brothers Big Sister Association of Pennsylvania
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 231863690
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018
- Location
- Pottsville, PA, USA
- Phone
- 5702653009
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Big Brothers, Big Sisters
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,705
- Expenses
- $1,114
- Assets
- $14,779
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SUSAN BARTEL (PRESIDENT)
- JIM SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- SUSAN BARTEL (PRESIDENT)
- JIM SMITH (VICE PRESIDENT)
- MICHELE MOLANO (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To create an atmosphere of fellowship and intellectual development among agencies throughout the commonwealth. Through the sharing of ideologies and resources, the association strives to promote healthy youth/adult relationships and activities at the various reginal levels and to augment communications with big brothers/big sisters of america
What it reported doing in 2018
Provided state-wide volunteer services by matching an adult with a child under the bib brothers/big sisters program of america. Any program funds received through gov't agencies are direct pass through program monies to assit in this endeavor
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 79
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 69.9%; rating input score 96; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 13.27; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 31.7% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 4 of 5 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part I part ii net assets crosscheck did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.