Biddeford Pool Improvement Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
042707411
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2022
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2022
Location
Biddeford Pool, ME, USA
Phone
9732144431
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Reported finances

Revenue
$9,380
Expenses
$11,992
Assets
$76,100
Liabilities
$4,497

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID BEANLAND (PRESIDENT)

People named in this filing

  • DAVID BEANLAND (PRESIDENT)
  • CHRIS FLYNN (VICE PRESIDE)
  • JEFF GOLDSMITH (SECRETARY)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The association endeavors to promote the conservation and preservation, for the benefit of the general public, of the natural resources of the city of biddeford, Maine and the areas contiguous to it, including land and water resources, plant and animal life, and scientific, agricultural, natural and historic areas therein.

What it reported doing in 2022

Conservation activities including earth day observance, educational programs for adults and children, maintenance of walking paths, and general preservation and beautification of open spaces in and around biddeford pool.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 79% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 66% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 78.6%; rating input score 79
  • Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -27.8%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.35; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.06; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 35.2% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.5% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 0.2% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 78.6% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $7K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 4 filing years from 2019 to 2022
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 21/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 21/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.